OSRS staff is infinitely more capable in areas with a much smal

• Posted by Nanlina chen 20 July 2020 - Filed in Other - #OSRS gold  - 78 views

  They will need to bring the BTS videos. I can not recall why or if they stopped but these were nice to see at least something. Livestreams replaced it basically, but they're also adding Livestream Roundups in form of a transcripts now. They are the BTS. The don't do it. Livestreams are much longer. They reveal additional information (well, for RS3 anyway) about the designs and demos of RS gold the functions. They're also able to do interactive sessions and Q&A with the players. So there are a few positive factors for livestreams. For players that want bullet point mode videos, then perhaps they like the old BTS movies more.
  
  Since RS3 is utilized to milk the playerbase for cash whilst reinvesting as small as you possibly can. When they told you what they have in store for you, you would just have more questions concerning why RuneScape gets so small why earning them a lot revenue.I would love to understand why there is so little - only the Morytania Expansion is completed from the OSRS side. People within this subreddit generally think that RS3 is driving far more revenue than it actual is though.It makes more cash than osrs with a small percent of the playerbase. That does not matter regardless of how much it gets past.
  
  I actually don't think that is true. Playerbase has been somewhere between 4:1 and a 3:1 split within a year, well in OSRS's favor for a long time. Lets provide them 3:1 participant disparity, or 75 percent of the subscription revenue, and move on the end. Even if we ignore that OSRS bonds exist and provide RS3 each one of the MTX revenue, this still brings the revenues to 50,739,879 OSRS to 41,549,375 RS3, and I left a few RS3 favored assumptions in this analysis. Nevertheless you'll be able to credit membership revenue to RuneScape people subscribe to play. If people play OSRS but not RS3 - which is a majority of readers then is earnings from OSRS, even if it is pooled.
  
  You can split the revenue from subscriptions depending on the percent the player plays with each game. This is similar to business 101. Just because a company is selling something that allows you to do multiple things (believe Amazon prime, or RuneScape membership) doesn't mean they are not tracking which of the goods the client is utilizing the most, and where that money should be attributed. I also gave RS3 the MTX revenue all so your second point is moot. I again aren't sure this is the situation. Whilst RS3 was on a slight downward trend from 2017 to 2018 OSRS exploded in popularity. At this exact same time the MTX revenue dropped, so despite so many more OSRS players to purchase bonds and boost the OSRS market share of that category of revenue, the whole pie dropped because of RS3 stumbling.
  
  OSRS staff is infinitely more capable in areas with a much smaller team size. Sucks to see from the aspect of things, but one match is treated nicely I guess. I would say that the RS3 team could learn from this, however since they have not by now. Only 1 out of 3 Runefest Reveals has been delivered after 8+ months... do not tell me RS3 staff should learn from this. I'm not talking about that aspect, I am talking from the RS3 team, which is the thread subject. I know you'll shield the RS3 team no matter what, found it countless times from you especially, but you can't tell me that how we get shit conveyed to cheap OSRS gold us is nice.